ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Virtual colonoscopy is the most recently developed tool for detecting colorectal cancers and polyps, but its effectiveness is limited. In our study, we compared the result of preoperative virtual colonoscopy to result of preoperative and postoperative colonoscopy. We evaluated also the accuracy of preoperative virtual colonoscopy in patients who had obstructive colorectal cancer that did not allow passage of a colonoscope. METHODS: A total of 164 patients who had undergone preoperative virtual colonoscopy and curative surgery after the diagnosis of a colorectal adenocarcinoma between November 2008 and August 2013 were pooled. We compared the result of conventional colonoscopy with that of virtual colonoscopy in the nonobstructive group and the results of preoperative virtual colonoscopy with that of postoperative colonoscopy performed at 6 months after surgery in the obstructive group. RESULTS: Of the 164 patients, 108 were male and 56 were female patients. The mean age was 62.7 years. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of virtual colonoscopy for all patients were 31.0%, 67.2%, and 43.8%, respectively. In the nonobstructive group, the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 36.6%, 66.2%, and 48.0%, respectively, whereas in the obstructive group, they were 2%, 72.4%, and 25.4%. Synchronous cancer was detected via virtual colonoscopy in 4 of the 164 patients. CONCLUSION: Virtual colonoscopy may not be an effective method for the detection of proximal colon polyps, but it can be helpful in determining the therapeutic plan when its results are correlated with the results of other studies.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Adenocarcinoma , Colon , Colonic Polyps , Colonography, Computed Tomographic , Colonoscopes , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Diagnosis , Methods , Polyps , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a well-established technique for evaluation of colorectal cancer (CRC). Signiifcant advances have been made in the technique of CTC since its inception. Besides being an excellent tool for detection of CRC, it is minimally invasive, less time-consuming and well tolerated by patients. Furthermore, it has fewer complications than conventional colonoscopy (CC) or barium enema (BE). The application of new technologies, such as electronic cleansing (EC) and dual-energy CT (DECT), enriches the examination of CTC. In 2005, a standardized reporting scheme, CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS), was put forward by the working group on virtual colonoscopy. They proposed that the report should include lesion size, number, morphology, location, attenuation and recommendations for lesion surveillance. New research progress and clinical applications of CTC in CRC are reviewed in this article. In addition, the paper also brielfy touches upon technique, indications, contraindications, safety and risk of CTC.
ABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea; it is the second most common cancer in men and the third most common in women. The incidence rate in Korea has continuously increased since 1999 when the National Cancer Registry statistics began. Currently; there are several screening modalities; that have been recommended by expert societies, including fecal occult blood test, colonoscopy, computed tomographic colonography The annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been used in adults aged 50 and older as part of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea since 2004. Although several study results from regional or national colorectal cancer screening programs in other countries have been reported, the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea has not yet been evaluated with evidence-based methods. Herein report the consensus statements on the National Screening Guideline for colorectal cancer developed by a multi-society expert committee in Korea, as follows: 1) We recommend annual or biennial FIT for screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic adults, beginning at 45 years of age and continuing until 80 years (recommendation B). 2) There is no evidence for the risks or benefits of FIT in adults older than 80 years (recommendation I). 3) Selective use of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening is recommended, taking into consideration individual preference and the risk of colorectal cancer (recommendation C). 4) There is no evidence for the risks or benefits of double-contrast barium enema for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic adults (recommendation I). 5) There is no evidence for the risks or benefits of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic adults (recommendation I).
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Barium , Colonography, Computed Tomographic , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Consensus , Early Detection of Cancer , Enema , Incidence , Korea , Mass Screening , Occult BloodABSTRACT
Objetivo: comparar, por meio de uma revisão sistematizada, a colonografia por tomografia (CTC) versus colonoscopia óptica (CO) em relação ao rastreamento e vigilância do câncer colorretal (CCR). Método: foram analisados estudos em inglês e português sobre CTC e CO realizados em humanos adultos de ambos os sexos, publicados no MedLine/PubMed (National Library of Medicine) e no Scielo (Scientific Eletronic Library Online) no período entre 1990 a 2013. A busca incluiu combinações de palavras-chave (Colonoscopy, Cólonoscopic surgery, virtual Colonoscopy, CT Colonography) com boolianos AND e OR. Os critérios de inclusão foram ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados, estudo de revisão, revisões sistemáticas com ou sem metanálise, consenso, pacientes adultos, pacientes assintomáticos ou sintomáticos. Os critérios de exclusão foram pacientes inapropriados e somente em resumo. Resultados: foram selecionados 26 estudos com melhor abordagem dos desfechos selecionados para rastreamento e vigilância do câncer (CCR). O número global de pacientes submetidos às variáveis foi de 397.342 indivíduos. Os valores das variáveis de sensibilidade e especificidade para detecção de pólipos maior ou igual a 10mm e câncer colorretal apresentam percentagens semelhantes, sendo a taxa de sensibilidade da CTC diretamente proporcional ao tamanho do pólipo. A taxa de pacientes submetidos à CO após a CTC variou de 12% a 36,4%; destes, 3,8% apresentaram lesões significativas. A análise da taxa de CO incompleta obteve um padrão de variações entre 11% e 64,8%. A aceitação dos pacientes, tanto para o preparo intestinal como para o procedimento, foi maior para a CTC. Os achados extracólicos nos pacientes submetidos à CTC foram analisados e variaram de 58 a 69%. As complicações dos dois métodos foram baixas, maior na CO. Conclusão: as diferenças na sensibilidade e especificidade entre a CO e a CTC no rastreamento e vigilância do CCR não são relevantes. A indicação de CO após CTC deve seguir critérios consensuais para evitar aumento de custos e de riscos ao paciente. Pacientes com CO incompleta têm indicação de realizar CTC por se enquadrar no grupo de alto risco para desenvolver CCR. A aceitação dos pacientes na realização dos dois métodos é boa e não representa impedimento ao rastreamento e vigilância do CCR. Os achados extracólicos na CTC é um benefício adicional para o paciente. As complicações inerentes aos dois métodos não superam o impacto positivo dos mesmos na prevenção do CCR.
Objective: to compare in a systematic review the computed tomographic Colonography (CTC) and the optical Colonoscopy (OC) methods for the screening and monitoring of colorectal cancer (CRC). Method: english and portuguese studies on CTC and OC that were carried out on adult humans of both genders that had been published in MedLine/PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) between 1990 and 2013 were analyzed. The search included combinations of keywords (Colonoscopy, Cólonoscopic surgery, virtual Colonoscopy, CT Colonography, etc.) with the AND and OR Boolean operators. The inclusion criteria were as follows: controlled and randomized clinical trials, review studies, systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis, consensus, adult patients, and asymptomatic or symptomatic patients. The exclusion criteria were as follows: unsuitable patients and manuscripts only containing abstracts. Results: twenty-six studies that included the selected outcomes for screening for and monitoring CRC were selected. The overall number of patients analyzed was 397, 342 individuals. The sensitivity and specificity percentages for the detection of polyps greater than or equal to 10 mm and for colorectal cancer were similar between the two methods, and the CTC sensitivity rate was directly proportional to the size of the polyp. The rate of patients undergoing OC after CTC ranged from 12% to 36.4%, and of these patients, 3.8% had significant lesions. The analysis of the incomplete OC rate found variation ranging from 11 to 64.8%. The acceptance rates of the patients for both intestinal preparation and for the procedure were greater for CTC. The extracolic findings in patients undergoing CTC were analyzed and ranged from 58 to 69%. Complications were minimal for the patients undergoing both methods and higher for those in the OC group. Conclusion: the differences in the sensitivity and specificity of OC and CTC in screening and monitoring CRC are not significant. The indication of OC after CTC must follow agreed-upon criteria to avoid increased costs and risks to the patient. Patients with an incomplete OC should undergo CTC, as they fall within the high risk group for developing CRC. The acceptance of patients undergoing the two methods is good and does not represent an impediment to screening for and monitoring CRC. The extracolic findings, in the CTC group, is an additional benefit to the patient. The complications inherent in the two methods do not outweigh their positive impacts in the prevention of CRC.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Colorectal Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy , Colonography, Computed TomographicABSTRACT
Virtual colonoscopy (VC) or computed tomographic colonography is now an established imaging test in the detection of colorectal cancer. Like other modern imaging tests VC requires highly compliant patients (rectal air insufflation, breath hold, imaging in supine and prone position). As patients are getting older VC is also requested in the elderly. In a case series of geriatric patients (mean age 83 years) undergoing VC after incomplete optical colonoscopy 92.7% of all colonic segments were adequately visualized. VC seems to be feasible in geriatric patients and has therefore replaced barium enema in this patient group after incomplete optical colonoscopy at our department.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the value of low-dose computed tomographic colonography (CTC) performed with 64-slice CT in the diagnosis of incidental extracolonic lesions and its clinical significance .Methods The image data in 158 CTC examinations with two positions were retrospectively analyzed .All abdominal extracolonic lesions were recorded .According to the age ,the pa-tients were divided into two groups :elderly and non-elderly groups .The extracolonic lesions were divided into 4 groups(E1- E4) according to the clinical importance .The incidence rates in two groups were calculated respectively .Results The incidence rate of the E2-E4 level extracolonic lesions in the elderly group was higher than that in the non -elderly group ,the difference between them had statistical signficance (P< 0 .05) .Conclusion Low-dose CTC has the high diagnostic value in finding extracolonic le-sions ,and the incidence rate of extracolonic lesions with important clinical significance is increased with the age increase ,especially for the elder patients over the age of 60 years .
ABSTRACT
Now colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in males and the fourth most common cancer in females in Korea. Since most of colorectal cancers occur after the prolonged transformation of adenomas into carcinomas, early detection and removal of colorectal adenomas are one of the most effective methods to prevent colorectal cancer. Considering the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer and polyps in Korea, it is very important to establish Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection. The guideline was developed by the Korean Multi-Society Take Force and we tried to establish the guideline by evidence-based methods. Parts of the statements were draw by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Herein we discussed epidemiology of colorectal cancers and adenomas in Korea and optimal methods for screening of colorectal cancer and detection of adenomas including fecal occult blood tests, radiologic tests, and endoscopic examinations.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Adenoma , Colonography, Computed Tomographic , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Incidence , Korea , Mass Screening , Occult Blood , PolypsABSTRACT
There are approximately one million new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) per year worldwide, with substantial associated morbidity and mortality. The long natural history of colorectal neoplasia affords the opportunity to use preventive measures to improve survival in this disease. Currently screening for adenomatous polyps and early-stage cancers is the best methodology for improving survival. The increasing knowledge of CRC pathogenesis and its natural history is allowing the development of new tools to identify patients who will benefit most from colon cancer screening and the defining of appropriate surveillance intervals. The guidelines for screening for colorectal neoplasia have recently been substantially revised by several organizations based on developing technologies and a growing body of data on the efficacy of CRC screening.